Monday, December 8, 2014

Discovery Channel Responds to ?Eaten Alive? Criticism

The fact that Paul Rosolie didn?t follow through on his pledge to be eaten by a giant anaconda left many ?Eaten Alive? viewers less than impressed. However, the Discovery Channel is standing behind the television special as well as Rosolie?s decision to tap out of the whole thing.

In a statement to EW, the network explained, ?Paul created this challenge to get maximum attention for one of the most beautiful and threatened parts of the world, the Amazon Rainforest and its wildlife. He went to great lengths to send this message and it was his absolute intention to be eaten alive.?

?Ultimately, after the snake constricted Paul for over an hour and went for his head, the experiment had to be called when it became clear that Paul would be very seriously injured if he continued on. The safety of Paul, as well as the anaconda, was always our number-one priority.?

Still, PETA is furious- ?The animals were removed from their water habitat and transported to a filming location, and the chosen snake was deceived into using her precious energy reserves to constrict a human being pretending to be a pig, all for a publicity stunt ? Paul Rosolie and his crew put this snake through undeniable stress and robbed her of essential bodily resources. She was forced to constrict and then not allowed to eat. Study after study has shown that entertainment features such as this one that show humans interfering with and handling wild animals are detrimental to species conservation. Rosolie knows this. Discovery knows this. Yet they chose to contrive and air this shameful stunt for ratings anyway.?

Source: http://www.gossipcenter.com/television/discovery-channel-responds-%E2%80%9Ceaten-alive%E2%80%9D-criticism-1690592

Rachel Nichols Ivanka Trump Roselyn Sanchez Michelle Obama Busy Philipps

No comments:

Post a Comment